13 August 2006
Let me stress again that I believe the updated benchmark that Amix has on his blog is entirely fair as it is written exactly how most people would write it.
That being said, I wanted to see what optimization of the DOM example could do against string concatination!
Get the zip here.
The zip contains two files:
My benchmarks for the two files:
Time run: 10 Number of iterations: 10
**Amix’s Original Updated Benchmark: **
Firefox 1. 5. 0. 4 (Gecko): Basic DOM: 838 ms AJS DOM: 2375 ms innerHTML: 365 ms RND template: 674 ms Konqueror 3. 5. 2 (KHTML): Basic DOM: 553 ms AJS DOM: 1662 ms innerHTML: 409 ms RND template: 648 ms
My modified DOM Example:
Firefox 1. 5. 0. 4 (Gecko): Basic DOM: 533 ms AJS DOM: 2399 ms innerHTML: 368 ms RND template: 666 ms Konqueror 3. 5. 2 (KHTML): Basic DOM: 421 ms AJS DOM: 1698 ms innerHTML: 418 ms RND template: 665 ms
These numbers are great, but I don’t have a copy of Internet Explorer to test on. I’ve been informed that in Internet Explorer innerHTML and RND blows the pants off of both DOM manipulation methods.
This makes perfect sense to me. One would expect innerHTML to be superior in the browser it was designed for. :)